Allahabad High Court
CRLP/7296/2026 of ANUPAM AGRAHARI AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7296 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7296 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the First Information Report dated 10.03.2026 (Annexure 1) in Case Crime No. 0056 of 2026, U/s 87, 351(2) BNS, Police Station Vindhyachal, District Mirzapur.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest or harass the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 10.03.2026 (Annexure-1) in Case Crime No. 0056 of 2026 U/S 87, 351(2) B.N.S. Police Station Vindhyachal, District Mirzapur."
2. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to address the Court, however, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present.
3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded on 10.04.2026 before the court concerned.
4. Heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioners, submission advanced by A.G.A. for the State and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, nothing is left for further adjudication in the instant writ petition.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Singh, Indresh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Anupam Agrahari And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad