Allahabad High Court
WRIC/29102/2026 of UDAY BHAN AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29102 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "i. Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 29102 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kaptanganj, District Kushinagar to accept the restoration application filed by petitioners under Order IX rule 13 C.P.C. read with Section 151 C.P.C., for recalling the order dated 25.06.2026 passed by respondent no. 2 in case no. 5264 of 2026 Computerized Case no. T202605440605264 'Jitendra Rao vs. Uday Bhan & others'. U/s 134 of U.P. Revenue Codeand decide the same on merits.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 25.06.2026 passed by respondent no. 2 in case no. 5264 of 2026 Computerized Case no. T202605440605264 'Jitendra Rao vs. Uday Bhan & others'. U/s 134 of U.P. Revenue Code."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners preferred a restoration application to recall the order dated 25.06.2026 passed by the respondent no.2, which has not been registered till date and no order has been passed as yet. He prays that the said restoration application may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Singh, Rishi Kant Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nitya Nand Mishra Uday Bhan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending application, in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2/Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kaptanganj, District Kushinagar to register the restoration application within a week from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and to decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks' thereafter. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 29102 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad