Allahabad High Court

WRIC/39289/2026 of SHIV KARAN AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39289 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. It is informed by Sri Amrish Sahai, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4 that several facts has been concealed by the petitioners in the present writ petition

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 39289 of 2026

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It is informed by Sri Amrish Sahai, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4 that several facts has been concealed by the petitioners in the present writ petition namely (1) filing of the Writ C No.39926 of 2025 (Tridev Nishad Vs. Indian Bank Zonal Office Gorakhpur Prashant Tower and another) in which judgement was delivered on November 15, 2025 (2) pendency of the S.A. No.220/26 in which an order was passed on 03.09.2026 fixing 05.10.2026 and other material facts. Hence a prayer has been made to dismiss present writ petition imposing exemplary costs and also initiate contempt proceedings against the petitioners.

2. At this point of time a prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioners to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed.

3. Since material facts has been concealed by the petitioners while approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, present writ petition is dismissed imposing cost of Rs.1,000/-, which shall be deposited by the petitioners in favour of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad within two weeks from today and further submit the receipt of deposit before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate/Collector, Siddharth Nagar. However, in case aforesaid cost is not deposited by the petitioners within the period stated above, the respondent no.2 is directed to initiate proceedings for recovery of aforesaid amount from the petitioners within one month. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amrish Sahai, C.S.C. Shiv Karan And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

4. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate copy of this order to District Magistrate, Siddharthnagar/respondent no.2 within three days. September 29, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 39289 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead