Allahabad High Court

WRIC/20632/2022 of M/S K.V. INSTITUTE SAGARPALI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20632 of 2022 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Pursuant to the order dated 30.8.2022 passed by this Court, instructions received under the signatures of Regional Director, Samajik Vaniki Prabhag, Ballia/respondent no.6 have

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 20632 of 2022

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Pursuant to the order dated 30.8.2022 passed by this Court, instructions received under the signatures of Regional Director, Samajik Vaniki Prabhag, Ballia/respondent no.6 have been placed before the Court by the learned Standing Counsel, the same is taken on record.

2. It is stated in the aforesaid instructions that the order pertaining to renewal of license of the petitioner is still pending consideration before the concerned authorities. From the perusal of record it appears that the matter is pending consideration for renewal of license for last several years.

3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the respondent no.2/Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Wild Life, U.P. Lucknow is the competent authority in the matter who will take a decision in the matter expeditiously.

4. In this view of the matter, in the interest of justice, the present petition is disposed of finally directing the respondent no.2/Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Wild Life, U.P. Lucknow to take a decision in the matter most expeditiously and positively within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

5. In case a decision has already been taken, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

6. Let this order be communicated to the respondent no.2/Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Wild Life, U.P. Lucknow through C.J.M. concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) forthwith. September 29, 2026/Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Maurya, Om Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : CSC (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) M/S K.V. Institute Sagarpali And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead