Allahabad High Court
CRLP/16254/2026 of SMT. TABASSUM Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16254 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16254 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents authority to conclude the pending investigation of Case Crime No. 50 of 2026 under section 333, 64(1), 89, 351(3) B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Thakurdwara, District Moradabad.
(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court' may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 17.04.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A., with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naushad Alam, Om Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Tabassum .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 16254 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad