Allahabad High Court
BAIL/32710/2026 of RAM JI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32710 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Lallan Prasad, learned counsel for accused applicant, Sri Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32710 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Lallan Prasad, learned counsel for accused applicant, Sri Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Ram Ji to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 145 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 of BNS, P.S.- Gajner, District- Kanpur Dehat during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 15.6.2026 lodged by father of the victim for enticement. It is contended that the victim in her statement under Section 183 BNSS has specifically stated that the victim left her parental home on her own. There was no sexual intercourse between them and she was not enticed by the accused applicant. The charge sheet has been submitted. There are two cases criminal history shown in the report but none is attributed to the accused applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.6.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the bail application.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lallan Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, Sudhir Kumar Shukla Ram Ji .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the statement of the victim under Section 183 BNSS, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 29, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 32710 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad