Allahabad High Court
WPIL/2325/2026 of RANDHEER SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2325 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Sudhir Bharti on behalf of respondent no. 4. 2. The present petition has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2325 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Sudhir Bharti on behalf of respondent no. 4.
2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents authority to remove the illegal encroachment over the Arazi No. 249 Mauza Donwar (Unval) Tahsil Bansgaon District-Gorakhpur recorded as Rasta in Revenue Record within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on the complaint made by him, R.C. Forms 19 & 20, as contemplated under Rule 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 have been issued to the respondent no. 5 and Case No. T202603310109481 has been registered under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending consideration.
4. In view of the aforesaid, as appropriate proceedings have been initiated against the encroacher, it is expected that it shall be concluded in accordance with law within the period prescribed under Rule 67(6) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 29, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiraj Srivastava, Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Arun Kumar,J.) Randheer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad