Allahabad High Court
WRIC/32967/2026 of DEEPAK SOLANKI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32967 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32967 of 2026
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing Respondent no. 2 Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Agra Division Agra, to decide the restoration application dated 24.12.2025 filed by the Petitioner in revision no. 1395 of 2023 (Computerized case no. C202301000001395) under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, within Stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court deem fit under the facts of the case."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a restoration application preferred by the petitioner to recall an exparte order dated 18.12.2025 passed in Revision No. 1395 of 2023, under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending before the respondent no.2 since 24.12.2025. He prays that the said restoration application may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection in the event this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the pending restoration application, in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradyumna Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Deepak Solanki .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
the respondent no.2/Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Agra Division, Agra to decide the pending restoration application within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 29, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 32967 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad