Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22863/2026 of HARIKESH AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 28 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22863 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22863 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 01.02.2026 in Case Crime No. 0004/2026 u/s 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S 2023 and 3/4 DP Act, Police Station Nagsar Hald, District Ghazipur (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition);
(ii) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to take coercive action against the petitioners (not to arrest the petitioners) in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. dated 01.02.2026 in Case Crime No. 0004/2026 u/s 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S 2023 and 3/4 DP Act, Police Station Nagsar Halt, District Ghazipur."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet against the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and final report against the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 have been forwarded on 29.03.2026 before the court concerned. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Kumar Sonkar, Vishal Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankur Yadav, G.A., Lorik Yadav, Pooja Yadav Harikesh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Lorik Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 and Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet as well as final report have already been forwarded against the petitioners as stated above, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22863 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad