Allahabad High Court
CRLP/15657/2026 of RAJAN YADAV ALIAS ANKIT AND 6 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 27 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15657 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15657 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 11.06.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 109 of 2026, under Sections 87, 61(2) of BNS, Police Station Sahpau, District Hathras.
ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to 2 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance to the impugned first information report dated 11.06.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 109 of 2026, under Sections 87, 61(2) of BNS, Police Station Sahpau, District Hathras."
2. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, learned AGA submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted final report on 17.07.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Suraj Pandey Rajan Yadav Alias Ankit And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the fact that after completion of investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the final report on 17.07.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, therefore, nothing left in this petition for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 28, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 15657 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad