Allahabad High Court
WRIC/37796/2025 of VIRENDRA SINGH AND 16 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 27 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37796 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The petitioners have filed this petition with regard to stopping
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37796 of 2025
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The petitioners have filed this petition with regard to stopping the respondents from parking/dumping/storing the seized and abandoned vehicles over the plots of the petitioners bearing no. 266-Kha, area 2.47 acres.
3. The petitioners allege that the said land is being used by the respondents for illegal dumping of the vehicles which cannot be permitted in any circumstances. The petitioners, in this regard, have filed representation to the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli - respondent no. 3. The sole prayer is to injunct the respondents from illegal dumping of the vehicles over the plot of the petitioners.
4. We have perused the records available on record and we find that if the petitioners are aggrieved by taking over possession by the respondents of the plots in question without any acquisition, then the appropriate remedy for the petitioners is to adopt the due process of law i.e. to file a civil suit before the appropriate forum. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in the petition.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. September 28, 2026/Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kumar Yadav, Bhola Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Virendra Singh And 16 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad