Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23459/2026 of GANESH KASHYAP Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 27 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23459 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "1. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23459 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main reliefs:- "1. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the First Information Report dated 30.07.2026 in Case Crime No. 0259 of 2026, under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of B.N.S. and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station- Saini, District- Kaushambi lodged by respondent no. 4.
2. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 30.07.2026 in Case Crime No. 0259 of 2026, under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of B.N.S. and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act 2000, Police Station- Saini, District- Kaushambi lodged by respondent no. 4.
3. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 not to take any coercive action against the petitioner."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 30.09.2026 to the Court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ganesh Kashyap .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the charge sheet has already been forwarded as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 28, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 23459 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad