Allahabad High Court
CRLP/23450/2026 of RAJ CHAUHAN @ SATYAM SINGH CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 27 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23450 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction of nature of Certiorari quashing
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23450 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction of nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 07.09.2026 pertaining to Case Crime No.0343 of 2026, under Section 87 of BNS, 2023, Police Station Naubasta, District Kanpur Nagar. (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest and harass the petitioner on the basis of Impugned First Information Report 07.09.2026 pertaining to Case Crime No.0343 of 2026, under Section 87 of BNS, 2023, Police Station Naubasta, District Kanpur Nagar."
2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 17.09.2026.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Faizan Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raj Chauhan @ Satyam Singh Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. September 28, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 23450 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad