Allahabad High Court
WRIC/38710/2026 of M/S HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LTD. Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38710 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 26.03.2026 passed by the respondent no.2-Chief Judicial
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38710 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 26.03.2026 passed by the respondent no.2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad in Misc. Case No.3240 of 2025 filed by the petitioner against private respondent nos.3
& 4 and others. The order which is under challenge reads as follows :- "पत्रावली पेश हुई। बार-बार प्रकार कराने पर भी प्रार्थी की ओर से कोई उपस्थित नहीं है।
पत्रावली के परिशीलन से ज्ञात होता है कि माननीय उच्च न्यायालय द्वारा प्रस्तुत प्रकरण का निस्तारण अंदर तीस दिवस किये जाने हेतु निर्देशित किया गया है परन्तु प्रार्थी की ओर से विगत कई तिथियों से कोई उपस्थित नहीं आया है, प्रार्थी को अनेक अवसर प्रदान किये जा चुके हैं, उसके बाबजूद भी वह उपस्थित नहीं है और न ही प्रार्थी द्वारा दस्तावेज मिलान के लिए मूल दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत किये गये हैं। अतः प्रार्थी के निरन्तर अनुपस्थित रहने के कारण प्रार्थी की अनुपस्थिति में विविध प्रार्थना-पत्र निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
आदेश
प्रस्तुत विविध प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रार्थी की अनुपस्थिति में व बल न दिये जाने कारण निरस्त किया जाता है।"
2. From perusal of the record it transpires that petitioner earlier approached this Court by filing a petition being Writ C No.42608 of 2025 connected with other petitions with the prayer to expedite the hearing of the case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Sharma, Nitesh Kumar Jauhari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Hinduja Housing Finance Ltd. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Pursuant to the order passed by this Court when petitioner himself was not present before the respondent no.2 the matter was dismissed.
3. After hearing counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that present writ petition is totally misconceived and liable to be dismissed imposing exemplary cost.
4. At this point of time, a prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed.
5. Taking a lenient view, we are dismissing the present writ petition without imposing any costs. September 24, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 38710 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad