Allahabad High Court

WRIC/38603/2026 of SMT. KRISHNA SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38603 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. By

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 38603 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated respondent no.3. 11.06.2026 issued by respondent no.3.

(11) Issue nature writ order or a of direction in the mandamus directing the respondent no.3 and 4 not to create any hindrance in the peaceful possession of the petitioner upon the land in question on the basis of notice dated 11.06.2026."

3. From a perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioner has already submitted a reply to the notice on 27.08.2026, which has not been considered and decided till date.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 submits that he has no objection in the event the respondent no. 3 is directed to dispose of the matter of notice after taking into consideration the objection filed by the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law and giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned.

5. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the objection of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishnu Kant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vibhu Rai Smt. Krishna Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

petitioner strictly in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

6. Until such decision is taken, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the notice. September 24, 2026 Sachin Mishra WRIC No. 38603 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead