Allahabad High Court
NA528/41074/2026 of RAVISHARAN AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41074 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41074 of 2026
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: " यह कि सम्माननीय न्यायालय से न्यायहित में सादर प्रार्थना है कि मुकदमा अपराध संख्या-555/2015 अन्तर्गत धारा 498ए, 323, 504, 506, भारतीय दण्ड संहिता, व 3/4 दहेज प्रतिषेध अधिनियम थाना- गोवर्धन, जनपद-मथुरा, के सन्दर्भ में माननीय न्यायालय अपर मुख्य न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट न्यायालय संख्या-2 मथुरा द्वारा केस नं० 1107/IX/2016 (कम्प्यूटर पर दर्ज नं0 9417/2016) दिनांकित 1-4-2016 प्रसंज्ञान लिया गया जो माननीय न्यायालय के समक्ष लम्बित संज्ञानित आरोप पत्र संख्या-11763/2016, दिनांकित 15-2-2016 एवं माननीय न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश दिनांकित 3-12-2025 (N.B.W) गैर जमानतीय वारण्ट (संलग्नक संख्या-2) को इस दाण्डिक प्रकीर्ण प्रार्थना पत्र को निरस्त / विखण्डित /शून्य/रद्द किये जाने का उचित न्यायोचित आदेश पारित किये जाने की महती कृपा करें।"
3. After some argument, learned Counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit. The applicants are ready to appear before the Trial Court concerned within two weeks and will file application for cancellation of non-bailable warrants. He prays that the Trial Court may be directed to decide the said application as expeditiously as possible, as per provisions of law.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection.
5. Looking to the limited prayer made by the learned Counsel for the applicants, this application is disposed of with a direction that in case the applicants appear before the concerned Trial Court and file application for cancellation of non-bailable warrants, the same be decided as expeditiously Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Chaurasia, Vijay Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravisharan And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
as possible, as per provisions of law.
6. For the period of two weeks or till appearing before the Trial Court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in pursuance of the aforesaid case. September 24, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 41074 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad