Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Order passed by Ld. P.O. CGIT1 Delhi EPF matters dated 31.07.2025 on 31 July 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
D-1/07/2021 M/s Sundar Lal Jain Charitable Hospital vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi North Present: Sh. M.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the appellant
Sh. Satpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for Respondent.
Order Dated-31.07.2025 Today the case is listed for hearing on the misc. application filed on behalf of the appellant ‘for withdrawal of appeal on account of amicable settlement’. Though, the application stands already served upon the respondent, however, no written reply is filed today. Accordingly, respondent is directed to file his reply duly supported with an affidavit regarding the fact of amicable settlement, if any, on the next date of hearing. Put up on 07.08.2025 for filing of reply by respondent and consideration of this application. Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
D-1/80/2024 M/s Bicon Electric Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC, Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel, for the Appellant.
Sh. Narender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-31.07.2025 Today the case is listed for reporting compliance of the order dated 09.06.2025 wherein the appellant was directed to deposit the complete amount assessed u/s 7Q of the EPF & MP Act, 1952. Ld. counsel for the appellant has filed a original FDR amounting to Rs.3,77,377/- (account no. 40660300019801, Bank Of Baroda). The same is kept in the case file. As the appellant has complied with the condition imposed for granting stay, respondent is directed not to take any coercive measure for recovery of the amount as mentioned in the impugned order passed u/s 14B of the Act till finalization of this appeal.
Respondent counsel has already filed his reply to the appeal which is found on record. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has also received the same and wants some time to file the rejoinder. Accordingly, put up on 23.09.2025 for filing of rejoinder by the appellant.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
34(4)2016 M/s Adigear International vs. APFC.
Present: Sh. Raj Kumar, proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Sandeep, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-31.07.2025 Record perused. For the last several occasions matter has not come up on board and it has been adjourned en-block by the predecessor of this tribunal. Let the case be listed for final arguments on 29.09.2025.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
729(4)2015 M/s Saraswati Construction Comp. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi (North).
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. Manu Parashar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep, A/R for
the Respondent.
Order dated-31.07.2025 Record perused. For the last several occasions matter has not come up on board and it has been adjourned en-block by the predecessor of this tribunal. Let the case be listed for final arguments on 03.10.2025.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
Later, Sh. Vishal Arun, Ld. counsel for the appellant had contacted this tribunal on mobile phone of one of the staff and noted the next of hearing.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
802(4)2015 M/s Evershine House Keeping Services vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi.
Present: None for the Appellant.
Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Anil Kumar Meena,
A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-31.07.2025 Record perused. This case has been adjourned en-block since July, 2023 no substantial progess has been made. Ld. Counsel Sh. S.K. Arora & Sh. Rajiv Arora have been given information to appear. However, counsel for the respondent has submitted Sh. S.K. Arora & Sh. Rajiv Arora has left this case and as per information, appellant who was the proprietor of the establishment had expired.
In these circumstances, when the record does not speak about the demise of the proprietor as well as leaving out of this case. Let this matter listed for 29.09.2025. Let appellant counsel again be given notice to appear.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
1235(4)2014 M/s AK Manpower Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi.
Present: Sh. Chetan Singh, proxy for the Appellant.
Sh. Manu Parashar, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sandeep,
A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-31.07.2025 The proxy appearing on behalf of the appellant requested for an adjournment as the main counsel is not available today. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. Last opportunity is given to the appellant to argue the matter positively. Put up on 03.10.2025. It is made clear if any of the parties fail to argue the matter on the next date of hearing, the case shall be heard and decided on basis of the record available with this tribunal.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
D-1/98/2019 M/s Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC Delhi (North).
Order Dated-31.07.2025 Due to paucity of time, this matter could not be taken up and the same is adjourned for final arguments on 11.08.2025.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
D-1/99/2019 M/s Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC Delhi (North).
Order Dated-31.07.2025 Due to paucity of time, this matter could not be taken up and the same is adjourned for final arguments on 11.08.2025.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)
D-1/100/2019 M/s Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. RPFC Delhi (North).
Order Dated-31.07.2025 Due to paucity of time, this matter could not be taken up and the same is adjourned for final arguments on 11.08.2025.
Sd/- Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)