Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Karan Singh & Ors., vs IOCL & Anr on 11 August 2025
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL TRIBUNAL – CUM –
LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI
I.D No. 275/2021
Sh. Karan Singh, S/o Sh. Deep Chand,
R/o- House No.-98, Bhyanpur Khurd,
Radhma Road, Sonipat, Haryana-131001.
Through- Karmakar Ekta Kendra,
A-704, Transit Capm, Saheed Rajeev Gandhi, Colony, Govind Puri, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.
I.D No. 276/2021
Sh. Karan Singh, S/o Sh. Ram Mehar,
R/o- House No.-1079/3, Near Maya Chand Dairy, West Ram Nagar, Sonipat , Haryana-131001.
Through- Karmakar Ekta Kendra,
A-704, Transit Capm, Saheed Rajeev Gandhi, Colony, Govind Puri, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.
I.D No. 277/2021
Sh. Ramesh Kumar, S/o Late Sh. Daya Ram, R/o- RZ-54-B, Prem Nagar, C-Block, Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043.
Through- Karmakar Ekta Kendra,
A-704, Transit Capm, Saheed Rajeev Gandhi, Colony, Govind Puri, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.
I.D No. 278/2021
Sh. Rajesh Kumar, S/o Sh. Kallu Ram,
Through- Karmakar Ekta Kendra,
A-704, Transit Capm, Saheed Rajeev Gandhi, Colony, Govind Puri, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Plot No. 3079/3, Sadiq Nagar, JB Tito Marg, Near Delhi Jal Board Office, Greater Kailash, New Delhi-110049.
2. Sudhir Kumar Security Agency, Unit No. 246, Plot No. 02, LSC, Vardhaman, Crown Mall, Sector-19, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075.
Appearance:- For Claimant: None for the claimants. For Management: Sh. Vinay Sabarwal, Ld. AR alongwith Sh. Karan
(proxy) for management no. 1.
None for the management no. 2.
AWARD 11.08.2025
1. By this composite order, I shall dispose of these four applications of U/S 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act (here in after referred as an ‘Act’) filed by the different claimants against the same respondents, because of having the common respondents and same cause of action, these cases are taken together for their illegal termination. Claims of the workmen are that they have been serving the management-1 through management-2. Name and particulars of their employment are given below-
List of Workmen Sr. no Name Post Dates of Joining Dates of Termination Last drawn Salary
Karan Singh Security Guard 30.06.2003 20.01.2021 26,091/-
Karan Singh Security Guard 01.06.2001 20.01.2021 26,091/-
Ramesh Kumar Security Guard 01.12.2010 20.01.2021 26,091/-
Rajesh Kumar Security Guard 01.01.2004 20.12.2020 26,091/-
2. They had been doing their work with diligently and honestly. Their service records are clean and they have not given any complaint so far. During the services, management never provided any legal facilities. When claimants demanded all the above said legal facilities, the employer immediately became angry and in a spirit of revenge, their services were illegally terminated by the management on 20. 12.2020 & 20.01.2021 respectively, without prior notice, without any notice charge sheet, without any rhyme and reason, which is a violation of 25-F of the I.D. Act. They have sent the demand letter but they have not been taken on duty. They had gone to the conciliation officer, but, no results were yielded. Hence, they have filed the present claims.
3. W.S has been filed by the respondent-1, stating that workmen were the employee of M-2. Therefore, the present claims are not maintainable against the M-1 and are liable to be dismissed.
4. Management-2 has filed its W.S. denying the averment made in the statement of claims. He submitted that claim of the claimant be dismissed.
5. Matters were listed for filing of rejoinder from several dates. Despite being several opportunities, they have failed to file rejoinder. On 18.03.2025, their rights to file rejoinders were struck off. Now, these matters are listed for listed for framing of issues, however, still, they have not been appearing to substantiate their claims.
6. In these circumstances, when claimants have not been appearing since long to substantiate their claims, this Tribunal has no other option but to pass the no dispute award. No dispute award is passed accordingly. Copies of award be sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. Records of these files are consigned to record room. A copy of this award is placed in each of the file.
ATUL KUMAR GARG Date- 11.08.2025
Presiding Officer
CGIT-cum- Labour Court-II