BAIL/34116/2026 of SHREYJAL @ SUJAL Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 23 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34116 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to allow this Bail Application and the applicant be enlarged on Bail in Case Crime No. 326 of 2025, under Sections 310(2), 317(3), 317(4) B.N.S., Police Station- Pipri, District-Kaushambi during the pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the subject case. FIR has been lodged against the unknown person alleging that certain unknown accused persons had snatched the informant's bag, which contained a mobile phone, an ATM card, and cash amounting to Rs. 3,000/-. He further submitted that co-accused, Babu Pasi @ Omi Pasi and Manish Chaturvedi @ Pillo have been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.6.2026 and 6.8.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 17540 of 2026 and 27401 of 2026, respectively. It was, therefore, contended that the case of the applicant stands on parity with the co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 15 of the instant bail application. Learned counsel further submitted that the applicant is in judicial custody since 22.12.2025. It was argued that in the event of release on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail, shall not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ghazala Bano Quadri, Maseeh Uddin, Saima Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shreyjal @ Sujal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

evade the course of justice, and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings. Per contra, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the co-accused have already been granted bail by Coordinate Benches of this Court, this Court finds that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Shreyjal @ Sujal, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

(i) . The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

(ii) . The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

(iii) . The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court concerned shall be at liberty to take appropriate coercive measures for securing the presence of the accused and/or to cancel the bail granted to him in accordance with law. The identity, status, and proof of residence of the applicant as well as the sureties shall be duly verified by the court concerned before acceptance of the bail bonds. September 24, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 34116 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad