Allahabad High Court

WRIC/38579/2026 of DHARAMPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38579 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 38579 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

2. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to ensure the protection of the life and property of the petitioner and to prevent the private respondents from illegally interfering with, threatening, or forcibly dispossessing the petitioner from his lawful possession over his 1/3rd share in Gata No. 881, situated at Village Jevda, Police Station Rahra, Tehsil Hasanpur, District Amroha.

ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities, particularly respondents nos. 2 to 5, to consider and decide the representation/application dated 30.01.2026 submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time-bound period fixed by this Hon'ble Court"

3. In our considered view, the relief is in the nature of injunctions arising out of a pure civil dispute which may involve disputed questions of fact and hence, petitioner may avail remedy of civil suit, if so advised. Accordingly, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter.

4. In the event the petitioner has approached the police authorities or the District Administration seeking necessary help, it shall be the duty of the

Versus

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dharampal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

police authorities to ensure that law and order is maintained and is not disturbed by any anti-social element.

5. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 24, 2026 Sachin Mishra WRIC No. 38579 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead