Allahabad High Court
WRIC/38637/2026 of SMT. MAMATA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38637 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38637 of 2026
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "1. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent No.-2 to pay the compensation amount Rs.-500000/- to the petitioner on the accidental death of husband of petitioner as per provision of Chief Minister Farmer Accident Welfare Scheme(G. O. Dated-28-02-2020).
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No-.2 to decide the representation dated-30-07-2025 filed by the petitioner (Annexure No.-
17) to this writ petition."
3. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no.2 vide representation dated 30.07.2025 which is still pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to
Versus
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.B. Singh Parmar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Mamata Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no.2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. Needless to add that the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. September 24, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 38637 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad