Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15310/2026 of ARUN KUMAR PREMI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15310 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15310 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to provide or confer upon the petitioner the promotion on the post of Administrative Officer due since 09.10.2019 as well as to the post of senior administrative officer which was due on 29.01.2026 alongwith all consequential service benefits, including seniority, fixation of pay, and arrears of salary.
ii. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner dated 05.01.2023 within stipulated period from command of this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking his due promotions alongwith all consequential service benefits, including seniority, fixation of pay, and arrears of salary. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, Naveen Kumar, Raj Kumar Gupta, Satish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arun Kumar Premi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 15310 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad