Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13673/2026 of BIRENDRA SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13673 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, Shri K. M. Asthana, learned counsel for D.R.T. and perused the record. 2. The
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 13673 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, Shri K. M. Asthana, learned counsel for D.R.T. and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "1) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider his case and treat his service in continuity w.e.f. 11.09.1987, granting correct seniority, pay fixation, promotion, pension and all consequential monitory benefit forthwith. II) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 09.03.2026 moved by the petitioner before respondent authority within a time fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking promotion, pay fixation as well as seniority after treating his service w.e.f. 11.09.1987. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anirudha Pandey, Veerendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Gopal Verma, Krishna Mohan Asthana Birendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 13673 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad