Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Mohd. Junaid vs MCD on 31 July 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Mohd. Junaid v/s East Delhi Municipal Corporation ID No. 79/2022
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDSUTRIAL TRIBUNAL – CUM – LABOUR COURT-II, NEW DELHI I.D. NO. 79/2022 Mohd. Junaid, S/o Mohd. Ikram, Through- The General Secretary, Municipal Employees Union, Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054.
VERSUS
The Commissioner, East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Udyog Sadan, 2nd Floor, Plot No. 419, Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi-110092.
Present: Ms. S. Dey, Ld. AR for the claimant. Sh. Rajiv Bhardwaj, Ld. AR for the management.
AWARD 31.07.2025
In exercise of powers conferred under clause (d) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Government of India through the Ministry of Labour and Employment, vide its Order No. L-42011/42/2022-IR(DU) dated 21.02.2022 has been pleased to refer the following dispute between the employer, that is the Management of East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Delhi and their workman for adjudication by this Tribunal, terms of which are as under: “Whether demand of Municipal Employees Union vide letter dated 18.05.2019 to the management of East Delhi Municipal Corporation for regularization of the services
Mohd. Junaid v/s East Delhi Municipal Corporation ID No. 79/2022
of Mohd. Junaid S/o Mohd. Ikram on the post of Asst. Pump Driver (APD) with retrospective effect from the date of his initial appointment i.e. June, 1998 (instead of from 01.04.2006) and to pay him entire difference of the arrears of wages on the principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work from his initial joining along with all other consequential benefits, is proper, legal and justified? If yes, what relief is the disputant entitled to and what directions are necessary in this respect?”
After receiving the reference workman had filed the claim statement. W.S had been filed by the respondent. Rejoinder has also been filed by the AR of the workman.
During the course of proceedings, AR for the claimant has moved an application for passing ‘No Dispute Award’. It is submitted in the application that the claimant seeks to withdraw the present dispute due to personal difficulties, and as such prays for a ‘No Dispute Award’ to be passed by this tribunal.
In view of the above submission, ‘No Dispute Award’ is passed accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. Record of this file is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG Date: 31.07.2025
Presiding Officer
CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II