Allahabad High Court

WRIA/15517/2026 of ANAND PRAKASH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15517 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no. 2 sell/regularized the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 15517 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no. 2 sell/regularized the quarter no. 4/5 Shashtri Nagar in the favour of petitioner after declaring the dying cadre, in pursuance of the circular/government order dated 21.01.1988, 20.9.1994, 2.2.1995 as well as their own orders dated 23.05.2013 and 20.06.2013, by which the respondent no.2 has regularize the staff quarter in the favour of 200 other employees residing in their quarters.

Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 26.8.2015, 10.5.2020, 15.7.2025."

2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent no.2, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.

3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the above-mentioned representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwarya Singh, Kamla Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Anand Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead