Allahabad High Court

A227/13371/2026 of MOHD KHALID AND 10 OTHERS Vs SMT AKBARI AND 9 OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13371 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i). issue an order interim direction to decide the Misc. Case No. 14/2026 pending since 20.01.2026 in

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13371 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i). issue an order interim direction to decide the Misc. Case No. 14/2026 pending since 20.01.2026 in Original Suit No. 575 of 1964 (New Case No. 974 of 2024) Sri Abdul Sakur and others Vs Sri Kallan and others pending before the court of Civil Judge (S.D.) /FTC Moradabad."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that plaintiffs have filed a partition suit in the year 1964, which is pending consideration, in which preliminary decree has been prepared but final decree till date has not been prepared.

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, requiring the trial court to proceed with partition suit of the year 1964 and conclude the proceedings by preparation of final decree, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without granting any adjournment to either of the parties, in case, there are no legal impediments.

4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jamwant Ram Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mohd Khalid And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt Akbari And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead