Allahabad High Court
A227/13400/2026 of DHRUV RAJAN Vs LAXMI SHARMA on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13400 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. Pass appropriate order and direct the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mainpuri to decide Suit
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13400 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1. Pass appropriate order and direct the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mainpuri to decide Suit filed by the petitioner bearing Case No. 127 of 2025 (Druv Rajan Vs. Laxmi Sharma) Under section 17 & 25 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 expeditiously in time period fixed by Hon'ble Court by hearing of day today basis."
2. It is contended that a case under Section 17 read with Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 registered as Case No.127 of 2025 is pending consideration before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mainpuri. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expediting the said case.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to sole respondent, with a direction upon Court concerned to decide the Case No.127 of 2025, under Section 17 read with Section 25 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dhruv Rajan .....Petitioner(s) Laxmi Sharma .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad