Allahabad High Court
BAIL/34082/2026 of VIKAS THAKUR @ ROHIT Vs STATE OF U.P. on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34082 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Awadh Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34082 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Awadh Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for the accused- applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Vikas Thakur @ Rohit to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 234 of 2026, under Sections 140(1), 61(2)(a) BNS, P.S.- Sen Paschimpara, District- Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in F.I.R. dated 14.08.2026 for abduction lodged by the victim abductee himself with the allegation that while the informant was returning after dropping his sister in the school, the three accused persons including the accused-applicant had surrounded and assaulted him and abducted him on his motorcycle. It is with the indulgence of the villagers that the abductee was released and lodged the report. It is further contended that there are two injuries on the person of injured. There is no abnormality deducted. Injuries are simple in nature, except the statement of the victim, there is no other incriminating material available. Further contended that one of the accused, Rudra Pratap Singh has challenged the F.I.R. before the writ jurisdiction of this Court, wherein he got the interim relief of the protection from arrest. There is no specific complicity against the accused-applicant. The applicant has one case criminal history, wherein he is on bail. The investigation is continuing. He is cooperating in the investigation. The applicant is in jail since 15.08.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Awadh Bihari Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Thakur @ Rohit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the complicity of the accused-applicant and the simple injuries shown on the person of injured.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 24, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 34082 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad