Allahabad High Court
WRIC/38783/2026 of SACHCHIDANAND VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38783 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 2 and
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38783 of 2026
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 2 and 3.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. To, issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to decide the case No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750 (State versus Renu Verma) as well as application dated 16.02.2026 of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible within stipulated period."
3. Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the complaint which he had filed had not been addressed.
4. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Azamgarh Development Authority states that the complaint of petitioner being case No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750 (State versus Renu Verma) would be decided as expeditiously as possible.
5. Without going into the merits of the case, we direct that the complaint of the petitioner being case No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750 (State versus Renu Verma) shall be decided within a period of one month from the date of presentation of the certified copy of this order.
6. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 24, 2026 M.S. Ansari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Dubey, Vipul Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Santosh Kumar Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sachchidanand Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad