Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15518/2026 of SUBHAWATI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 23 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15518 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus 2 directing/commanding the respondent no. allot/sell/regularized the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15518 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus 2 directing/commanding the respondent no. allot/sell/regularized the 4/12, Welfare Centre, Staff Quarter, Shashtri Nagar, Kanpur Nagar, in the favour of petitioner, after declaring the dying cadre in pursuance of the circular/government order dated 16.9.2000 in pursuance of the government orders dated 21.01.1988, 20.9.1994, 2.2.1995 and their own orders dated 23.05.2013 and 20.06.2013, by which the respondent no.2 has regularize the staff quarter in the favour of Mohd. Jaki Mohani and Yamuna Pandey and others.
Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.1.2015 and 15.12.2021, 18.9.2025.
Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the quarter no. 4/12, Welfare Centre, Staff Quarter, Shashtri Nagar Kanpur Nagar.."
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent no.2, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the above-mentioned representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kandu, Kamla Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Subhawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad