Allahabad High Court

WRIC/38639/2026 of BALISTAR SINGH AND 8 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38639 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 38639 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.2 and 3 to delete the names of the petitioners from Electoral List of Nagar Palika Parishad, Jaswant 2 Nagar, Etawah and Registered the names of the petitioners in the final Electoral List of 2026 of Gram Panchayat Khitaura, Mahewa Development Area, Mahewa, District- Etawah prepared for in the respect of Gram Panchayat Elections at the earliest.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 and 4 to decide the representation dated 20.03.2026 and 07.05.2026 (Annexure No.4) of the petitioners regarding the deletion of their names from Electoral List of Nagar Palika Parishad, Jaswant Nagar, Etawah and addition of their name in the Final Electoral List of 2026 of Gram Panchayat, Khitaura, Mahewa Development Area, Mahewa, District Etawah."

3. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent nos.3 and 4 vide representation dated 20.03.2026 and 07.05.2026 which are still pending consideration.

4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent nos.3 and 4 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikarm Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushlesh Pratap Singh, Saurabh Tiwari Balistar Singh And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent nos.3 and 4 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representations and decide the same within a period of one months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

6. Needless to add that the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. September 24, 2026 Kuldeep WRIC No. 38639 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead