Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14757/2026 of SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14757 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 and 4 to decide the application of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14757 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 and 4 to decide the application of the petitioners dated 22.05.2026 (Annexure no.7), within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice;
ii. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the concern respondent authorities to provide 10% annual increment in honorarium to the petitioners for the period from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2024 in pursuance of the order dated 15.02.2024 (annexure no. 5);"
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioners have already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioners in accordance with law.
3. In view of these facts, respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are directed to consider and decide the application dated 22.05.2026 of the petitioners in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Babu Ray, Vikas Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Suresh Kumar Yadav And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad