Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14765/2026 of VINOD KUMAR TIWARI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14765 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents no. 2 and 3 to submit the recommendation

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 14765 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents no. 2 and 3 to submit the recommendation in pursuance of the guidelines issued by DG Fire dated 29.01.2026 in respect of submitting citation in pursuance of the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India dated 23.04.2024 and 16.01.2026;

ii. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 DGP Fire to decide the representation of the petitioners and issue guidelines to the respondent no. 3 and 4 Commissioner for prepare soft and hardcopy of citation for Form A and Form B for recommendation of their names for gallantry award to the petitioners;"

2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioners have already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioners in accordance with law.

3. In view of these facts, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 11.03.2026 of the petitioners in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vinod Kumar Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 14765 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead