Allahabad High Court
NA528/40697/2026 of RAMENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40697 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.for the State. 2. The present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40697 of 2026
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.for the State.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased quash the charge Sheet dated 20.09.2024 with cognizance order dated 12.12.2025 as well as entire proceedings of case no. 2973 of 2025 Arising out of case crime no. 698 of 2024, Under Section 85, 352, 115(2) B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Baheri, District Bareilly on the basis of compromise Pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Baheri Dist- Bareilly."
3. Learned Counsel for applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that parties have amicably resolved their personal dispute, therefore, opposite party no.2 does not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed in pursuance to compromise.
4. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits no objection if the parties approach Trial Court to file compromise in the given circumstances.
5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Mishra, Vivek Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vinay Kumar Ramendra Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
adjudicated by the Trial Court. As such, the parties may appear before the Trial Court concerned and file the compromise entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the Trial Court.
6. No compromise shall be entertained by the Trial Court if the informant/victim/injured and accused are not signatories and appear before the Court of its verification. In case of exigency, the Trial Court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order.
7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the Trial Court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the Trial Court shall continue with the trial.
8. All the parties, who files compromise and get it verified, shall then file a joint application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding.
9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is, accordingly, disposed of.
September 23, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 40697 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad