Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14788/2026 of SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14788 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the benefits of service on the post of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14788 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the benefits of service on the post of Lab Assistant treating the Pay Grade of Rs. 4,600/ approved on 22.09.2014 in view of the Government Order dated 05.09.2014 in respect of sanctioning the benefits of services after completion of satisfactory services of 10 Years, 14 Years and 26 Years respectively on the post of Lab Assistants.
Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to make of payment of pensionary benefits/service benefits keeping in view of pay grade of Rs. 4,600/- approved on 22.09.2014 and also the arrears of payment of service benefits/pension on the post of Lab Assistant to the petitioner.
Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the service benefits/pensionary benefits treating pay grade of Rs. 4,600/- to the petitioner as and when it falls due.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent authority by moving a representation, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Chandra, Vikash Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sushil Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad