Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14289/2026 of CHATURI RAM GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14289 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(i) to issue
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14289 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 1 to issue necessary order for sanctioning retirement pension and other retirement benefits taking into account his entire service i.e. including service rendered in work-charge establishment within the period to be specified by the Hon'ble Court;
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 1 to pass on Petitioner's appropriate order representation dated 07-07-2026 in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and Others and the order dated 20-11-2024 passed in the case of Ram Nagina Lal, within the period to be specified by the Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking retirement pension and other retirement benefits. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no. 1 to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Singh, J.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chaturi Ram Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 14289 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad