Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14746/2026 of SATISH KUMAR CHAUDHARY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14746 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents for resuming duties of petitioner as earlier

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 14746 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents for resuming duties of petitioner as earlier he was posted at Gram Vikas Adhikari at Sirathu Block, District - Kaushambi to the petitioner in pursuance of enquiry report dated 16.06.2026 Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition.

2. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents, he may be paid his full regular salary and arrears of his salary in accordance with law and rule."

2. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the domestic inquiry held, the petitioner has been exonerated by the Inquiry Officer and therefore he may be permitted to resume his duties.

3. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that departmental proceedings against the petitioner has yet not been concluded and therefore unless departmental proceedings are concluded, he cannot be permitted to rejoin merely on the basis of Inquiry Officer's report.

4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. However, it is provided that since Inquiry Officer has submitted its report after inquiry, the disciplinary authority, i.e. respondent No. 5, is directed to conclude the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Lakhan Kanoujia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satish Kumar Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

copy of this order, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 14746 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead