Allahabad High Court
BAIL/33068/2026 of JAYABUL Vs STATE OF U.P. on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33068 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Yasharth Raj Pandey, learned counsel holding brief appeared for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33068 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Yasharth Raj Pandey, learned counsel holding brief appeared for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Jayabul to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2) BNS, P.S.- Masuri, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 08.08.2025 lodged by father of the victim for enticement. In the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, she specifically stated that accused applicant called her and she went with the accused applicant to Delhi. The accused applicant has not committed any wrong act with her. The applicant has no criminal history. Charge sheet is submitted. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 14.08.2025. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considering the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd Aamir Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jayabul .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 33068 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad