Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14747/2026 of VIRENDRA SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14747 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- "( a ) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to promote the petitioner on the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14747 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to promote the petitioner on the post of Sub Inspector in pursuance to the promotional proceedings undertaken by them in the year 2025
(b) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to promote the petitioner on the post of Head Constable with effect from 2016 and grant all consequential benefits."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that petitioner may be permitted to file a comprehensive representation in this regard afresh.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with direction that in case such a representation is submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided by concerned respondent in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.
5. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. September 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Virendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad