Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14285/2026 of SMT. PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14285 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "I. Issue
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14285 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the Respondent Authorities to deduct a sum of Rs. 8,000/- per month from the salary of the Respondent no.5 and same may be credited to the account of the Petitioner.
II. Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to take the appropriate action upon the representation of the Petitioner dated 23.04.2026."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that an order of maintenance has been passed in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the Family Court which is not being complied with despite the executing court have passed the orders.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that this petition is not cognizable by this Bench and the petitioner may approach either the Bench hearing matters under Article 227 or before the Bench hearing matter arising out of proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hariom Upadhyay, Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Priyanka And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under law.
7. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photo copy of the same. September 23, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 14285 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad