Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14738/2026 of NISHA BHARTI AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14738 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioners' claim for the 6-month pre-promotion training for the post

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 14738 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioners' claim for the 6-month pre-promotion training for the post of Swasthya Paryavekshak (Mahila) in accordance with the Uttar Pradesh Medical Health and Family Welfare Department Health Workers and Health Supervisors (Male and Female) Non-Gazetted Service Rules, 2018.

ii. Mandamus, directing the Respondents to include the names of the Petitioners in the list of eligible Health Workers to be forwarded to the Director General, Family Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, for the purpose of the training scheduled for January 2026.

iii. Mandamus, directing the Respondents to prepare and publish the complete seniority list of Women Health Workers in District Azamgarh and to apply the same for the purpose of promotion.

iv. Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioners' representations dated 18-08-2025, 15-11-2026 and 10-11-2025 and to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law."

2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioners have already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioners in accordance with law.

3. In view of these facts, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 8.08.2025, 15.11.2026 and 10.11.2025 of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Nisha Bharti And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

the petitioners in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 14738 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead