Allahabad High Court
BAILC/363/2026 of BOBY YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 363 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant whereas Sri Himanshu Kumar, learned AGA is present for the State. 3.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 363 of 2026
Court No. - 66
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List of fresh cases has been revised.
2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant whereas Sri Himanshu Kumar, learned AGA is present for the State.
3. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed to cancel the bail granted to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 05.08.2026 passed by this Court in case crime no. 0046 of 2026, under Sections-85, 80(2) BNS, 2023 and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chaubiya, District Etawah.
4. Present bail cancellation application has been filed on the ground that the opposite party no.2, who is the father-in-law of the deceased was on bail in pursuance of the order dated 05.08.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.26753 of 2026, after he was released on bail, he had threatened the first informant regarding which an application was given to SSP, Etawah, SHO, Etawah and also to SHO, Police Station-Chaubiya, Etawah. Therefore, present bail application of opposite party no.2 for violation of bail condition deserves to be cancelled.
5. However, learned AGA has submitted that he has received instructions and on the basis of instructions, he has submitted that no such application was moved by the applicant before the concerned police station. Therefore, present application deserves to be cancelled.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into account that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Boby Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
there is no first information report or enquiry report by any authority regarding threatening of the first informant by the opposite party no.2 and even the application annexed at page no.46 allegedly given to the concerned SHO was not given. Therefore, this court is not inclined to allow this application.
7. Accordingly the bail cancellation application is rejected. September 23, 2026 S.C. BAILC No. 363 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad