Allahabad High Court
BAIL/33869/2026 of SHAILESH SINGH @ SHAILU SENGAR Vs STATE OF U.P. on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33869 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun & Sri Kunwar Bhaskar Parihar, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33869 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun & Sri Kunwar Bhaskar Parihar, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Shailesh Singh @ Shailu Sengar to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 185 of 2026, under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S.- Bakewar, District- Etawah, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the delayed F.I.R. has been lodged by Ashit Singh, the son of injured on 30.06.2026 for the incident dated 28.06.2024 against four persons including the accused-applicant that they have assaulted the injured with kulhari, iron rod and country made pistol. It is due to village party politics, the accused persons have been falsely implicated. Further contended that there is continuous change in the version of the incident. Further contended that the medico-legal injury report shows six injuries on the person of injured, out of which, five injuries were shown simple in nature in medico legal and supplementary medico-legal report, wherein injury no.6 is grievous as there is fracture of 4th, 5th and 6th rib of the left side of chest. Further contended that the injuries have not been inflicted by the accused-applicant and the delay in lodging the F.I.R. shows false implication. The applicant has three cases criminal history and in all the cases, he is on bail. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant is in jail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kunwar Bhaskar Parihar, Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shailesh Singh @ Shailu Sengar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
since 24.07.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the number and nature of injuries sustained by the accused- applicant and apparent delay in F.I.R. as well as the change of the version of the incident.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 33869 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad