Allahabad High Court

A227/13285/2026 of SHAH ALAM Vs NIGHAT AARA B. on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13285 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). issue, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned court/Principal Judge Family

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13285 of 2026

Court No. - 9

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). issue, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned court/Principal Judge Family Court, Sambhal at Chandausi to conclude and decide the Matrimonial Case/Hakook-E-Jaujiyat No. 434 of 2025 (Shah Alam Vs. Nighat Aara B) within stipulated period prescribed by this Hon'ble Court."

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was married to opposite party according to Muslim rites and customs on 10.06.2015. Matrimonial dispute has arisen between the parties which led them living separately. A matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal rights under the Muslim Law has been filed by petitioner which has been registered as Matrimonial Case/Hakook-E-Jaujiyat No. 434 of 2025 and the same is pending consideration before Principal Judge, Family Court, Sambhal at Chandausi. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Matrimonial Case/Hakook-E-Jaujiyat No. 434 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui, Saiyad Iqbal Ahmed Counsel for Respondent(s) :

Shah Alam .....Petitioner(s) Nighat Aara B. .....Respondent(s)

4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) A227 No. 13285 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead