Allahabad High Court
A227/13234/2026 of VIPIN MITTAL Vs HARIOM PORWAL AND 5 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13234 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 168
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13234 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 168 of 2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 168 of 2026 is pending consideration and till date same has not been decided by the court concerned.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 168 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Rohit Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Vipin Mittal .....Petitioner(s) Hariom Porwal And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad