Allahabad High Court
WRIB/4252/2026 of INDRAVESH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4252 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the stay
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4252 of 2026
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the stay application filed alongwith Revision No. 3284 of 2026, within a period as fixed by this Court.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the lease granted in favour of mother of the petitioners has been cancelled and an order has been passed by the Deputy District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Gunnaur, District Sambhal, expunging the name of petitioners from the revenue records. Submission is that the entire proceeding was without jurisdiction as there is no order by the competent authority holding the lease granted in favour of petitioners' mother to be invalid. The said order is under challenge in the aforesaid revision filed by the petitioners and is pending before respondent no. 2. Till date the stay application filed alongwith the revision has not been considered and the petitioners are under threat of eviction, therefore, a suitable direction be issued to respondent no. 2 to consider and pass necessary order on the stay application, within a time frame fixed by this Court.
4. Considering the urgency in the matter and petitioners' contention that they are under threat of their eviction, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider and pass necessary order on the stay application filed alongwith Revision No. 3284 of 2026, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. Indravesh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. If the pleadings are exchanged and all parties have put in appearance, the respondent no. 2 shall make endeavours to decide the revision itself, within a further period of five months thereafter. September 23, 2026 Ashok Kr. WRIB No. 4252 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad