Allahabad High Court
BAIL/33886/2026 of ANURAG Vs STATE OF U.P. on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33886 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Shyam Singh, learned advocate, holding the brief, appeared for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33886 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Shyam Singh, learned advocate, holding the brief, appeared for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Anurag to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 135 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS, P.S.- Linepar, District- Firozabad, during the pendency of trial.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the F.I.R. of enticement has been lodged by father of victim aged 16 years for her leaving the house on 06.06.2026, for which, the F.I.R. was registered on 07.06.2026. The statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS is in favour of the applicant, wherein she has stated that she has not been enticed. The applicant has not committed any sexual intercourse with her. The applicant has no criminal history. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant is in jail since 08.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Considered the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anurag .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 33886 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad