Allahabad High Court

A227/13286/2026 of BANNEY QURAISHI Vs SMT CHUNNI AND ANOTHER on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13286 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Mohd. Akaram, learned counsel for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13286 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Mohd. Akaram, learned counsel for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide the Rent Case No.12 of 2011 (New Rent Case No.1719 of 2022 [Banney Quraishi Vs. Smt. Chunni Devi and Another], under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, within a stipulated time period. The petitioner has described himself to be the landlord-applicant in the pending case. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the petition, to point out that the proceedings were instituted on 17.3.2011, and thereafter although a fairly large number of dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, by way of the present petition, seeks a direction for proceedings to be expedited. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to the respondents is dispensed with. Having regard to the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavour to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Akaram, Suresh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) :

Banney Quraishi .....Petitioner(s) Smt Chunni And Another .....Respondent(s)

preferably within a period of three months, from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2026 Arun K. Singh A227 No. 13286 of 2026 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead