Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14726/2026 of SMT. SHALINI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 22 September 2026
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14726 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. To issue a writ order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 14726 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide petitioner's representations dated 28.02.2025 and 16.05.2025 and to appoint the petitioner compassionate ground on suitable post commensurate to her qualification (Clerk) under Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice.
II. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release all retiral dues i.e. NPS, GPF, Insurance and Family Pension in favour of petitioner and her minor posthumous daughter."
3. On the basis of instructions, learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected twice. Copy of the instructions be provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of these developments, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Shalini .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
with liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the order rejecting the candidature of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
September 23, 2026 Ved Prakash
WRIA No. 14726 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad