Allahabad High Court
A227/13220/2026 of AMEER BEG Vs SMT. NAAZ PARVEEN on 22 September 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13220 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- " A . Issue an appropriate order or direction directing the learned Principal Judge, family court, Bareilly
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13220 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A. Issue an appropriate order or direction directing the learned Principal Judge, family court, Bareilly to proceed with and decide Matrimonial Petition No. 655 of 2024 under the declaration suit, expeditiously preferably within such time as may be fixed by his Hon'ble court."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was married to opposite party according to Muslim rites and customs on 25.07.2021. Matrimonial dispute has arisen between the parties which led to filing Matrimonial Petition No. 655 of 2024 under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 by petitioner which is pending consideration before Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Matrimonial Petition No. 655 of 2024, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026//(V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Abid Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ameer Beg .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Naaz Parveen .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad